The new staff accountant is wrapping up the first-day orientation upon starting with her new accounting firm. After a day of meeting key employees and signing paperwork, the firm’s newest member listens to the administrative partner once again describe the firm’s mentoring program. Finally, the administrative partner assigns the young CPA to a partner with instructions to meet him first thing in the morning.
Day two, the bright-eyed and bushy-tailed CPA politely knocks on the mentoring partner’s half-opened door early in the morning. From inside the office a voice growls, “make an appointment with my assistant to talk to me about mentoring!” Upon returning to her cube, the young CPA emails her mentor’s assistant a meeting request for the following week. At lunchtime when the CPA is going through her LinkedIn contacts she begins to wonder who in her network is working for a firm that gives good career support and is also hiring.
Mentoring relationships fundamentally involve two people who agree to share professional experiences and insights. Ideally, the relationship is close and informal. It features a mature professional contributing industry or organizational wisdom connecting with a younger professional bringing exuberance and energy. Essentially, mentoring relationships are good for building trust and understanding within different levels of the firm. The desired benefit is better productivity among the professionals in the relationships. Unfortunately, firms pursuing that expected outcome often get a stale program that standardizes mentoring relationships throughout the firm.
To maximize the benefit, mentors and mentees require an inherent sense of mutual respect. They must establish fair and reasonable expectations for each other which they can leverage for mutual benefit. Mentoring works best when each party earnestly tries to out-give the other. In accounting firms, mentoring relationships often suffer when they are institutionalized. Once they are institutionalized, they tend to lack the necessary authenticity to be productive. The personal connection facilitates the respect for each other’s opinions and the desire for each individual’s improvement. Then, the relationship intentionally grows toward the desired outcome of building value.
A structured program is a good way to bring both individuals together for a mentoring relationship. But to be successful, eventually an authentic relationship has to develop. Without authenticity the experience is merely a scheduled engagement, instead of an exchange of developmental experiences.
A “mentoring program” requires a partner to take a staff accountant on a sales call. A “mentoring relationship” permits that staff accountant to participate in the sales presentation, then accept honest feedback on the return trip to the office. Mentoring delivers maximum benefit when focused on individual growth and not necessarily career advancement. It is not a human resources checklist item. However, mentoring is a powerful way for a firm to establish working relationships that focus on growing individual contributions and productivity.
By Glenn Hunter
Director of Member Development, Enterprise Worldwide/ The APA